pop size=10, number of bits=5, crossover points=1, experiments=5
print evals=100, max evals=1000, mutation=0.001, crossover=0.6, conv=0.89
solution = 961
Randomly initializing population.
Iteration 1 of GA at 0 generations

Iteration 1, Generation 1, Evaluations 0:

The best individual is 11111 with score: 961
Experiment #1
Individual 11111 found in 10 evaluations with score 961
Randomly initializing population.
Iteration 1 of GA at 0 generations

Iteration 1, Generation 1, Evaluations 0:

The best individual is 01111 with score: 900
Online Perf: 507.5, Offline Perf: 858.7, Best: 900
Convergence: 0, Re-evaluations: 0

Iteration 1, Generation 2, Evaluations 10:

The best individual is 11111 with score: 961
Experiment #2
Individual 11111 found in 14 evaluations with score 961
Randomly initializing population.
Iteration 1 of GA at 0 generations

Iteration 1, Generation 1, Evaluations 0:

The best individual is 11111 with score: 961
Experiment #3
Individual 11111 found in 10 evaluations with score 961
Randomly initializing population.
Iteration 1 of GA at 0 generations

Iteration 1, Generation 1, Evaluations 0:

The best individual is 01111 with score: 900
Online Perf: 348.5, Offline Perf: 835.6, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.2, Re-evaluations: 4

Iteration 1, Generation 2, Evaluations 10:
Online Perf: 400.312, Offline Perf: 859.75, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.4, Re-evaluations: 6

Iteration 1, Generation 3, Evaluations 16:
Online Perf: 436.944, Offline Perf: 864.222, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.4, Re-evaluations: 2

Iteration 1, Generation 4, Evaluations 18:
Online Perf: 490.955, Offline Perf: 870.727, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.6, Re-evaluations: 4

Iteration 1, Generation 5, Evaluations 22:
Online Perf: 506.708, Offline Perf: 873.167, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.6, Re-evaluations: 2

Iteration 1, Generation 6, Evaluations 24:
Online Perf: 520.038, Offline Perf: 875.231, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.6, Re-evaluations: 2

Iteration 1, Generation 7, Evaluations 26:
Online Perf: 545.233, Offline Perf: 878.533, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.6, Re-evaluations: 4

Iteration 1, Generation 8, Evaluations 30:
Online Perf: 556.781, Offline Perf: 879.875, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.6, Re-evaluations: 2

Iteration 1, Generation 9, Evaluations 32:
Online Perf: 556.781, Offline Perf: 879.875, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.6, Re-evaluations: 0

Iteration 1, Generation 10, Evaluations 32:
Online Perf: 564.029, Offline Perf: 881.059, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.6, Re-evaluations: 2

Iteration 1, Generation 11, Evaluations 34:
Online Perf: 564.029, Offline Perf: 881.059, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.8, Re-evaluations: 0

Iteration 1, Generation 12, Evaluations 34:
Online Perf: 564.029, Offline Perf: 881.059, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.8, Re-evaluations: 0

Iteration 1, Generation 13, Evaluations 34:
Online Perf: 579.472, Offline Perf: 882.111, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.8, Re-evaluations: 2

Iteration 1, Generation 14, Evaluations 36:
Online Perf: 593.289, Offline Perf: 883.053, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.8, Re-evaluations: 2

Iteration 1, Generation 15, Evaluations 38:
Online Perf: 593.289, Offline Perf: 883.053, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.8, Re-evaluations: 0

Iteration 1, Generation 16, Evaluations 38:
Online Perf: 593.289, Offline Perf: 883.053, Best: 900
Convergence: 0.8, Re-evaluations: 0

Iteration 1, Generation 17, Evaluations 38:
Randomly initializing population.
Iteration 2 of GA at 0 generations

Iteration 2, Generation 1, Evaluations 38:

The best individual is 11101 with score: 529
Online Perf: 46.6458, Offline Perf: 99.2083, Best: 529
Convergence: 0, Re-evaluations: 0

Iteration 2, Generation 2, Evaluations 48:

The best individual is 10111 with score: 841
Online Perf: 73.7308, Offline Perf: 144.269, Best: 841
Convergence: 0, Re-evaluations: 4

Iteration 2, Generation 3, Evaluations 52:
Online Perf: 73.7308, Offline Perf: 144.269, Best: 841
Convergence: 0.6, Re-evaluations: 0

Iteration 2, Generation 4, Evaluations 52:

The best individual is 11111 with score: 961
Experiment #4
Individual 11111 found in 58 evaluations with score 961
Randomly initializing population.
Iteration 1 of GA at 0 generations

Iteration 1, Generation 1, Evaluations 0:

The best individual is 11111 with score: 961
Experiment #5
Individual 11111 found in 10 evaluations with score 961